A liberal Democrat and a conservative Republican walk into a TV studio to debate the latest mass shootings — and walk out agreeing that an overarching problem is the absence of fathers in the home. I was not going to post this as it got too far past — although the truths in the discussion remain true — but then there was this nutjob killer in Texas.

Acrimony then agreement.

The first segment went exactly the way you would expect after El Paso. White racism, too many guns, etc. But the second, longer segment opened up our agreement. My opponent, who is a very long-term Democrat politician, continued to find disagreements and make political hay, but we really were agreeing on the primary issue of fatherhood and mental health. He just naturally wants to restrict guns, too. Give a listen.

This is ground where a lot of normal Americans who disagree on guns — not politicians, they’re hopelessly entrenched in narratives — can probably agree.

VIDEO: Conservative-Liberal TV Gun Debate Finds Common Ground Fatherhood
Liked it? Take a second to support Rod Thomson on Patreon!

Get more stuff like this

Don’t miss a single act of Revolutionary Truth... delivered to your inbox!

2 thoughts on “VIDEO: Conservative-Liberal TV Gun Debate Finds Common Ground Fatherhood

  • September 3, 2019 at 1:32 am
    Permalink

    Read – Publicize – Pass it on
    Few Americans know of the Liberal workbook to takeover the US Govt.

    8 Levels of Control:

    Saul Alinsky died about 43 years ago, but his writings influenced
    those in political control of our nation today.

    Recall that Hillary Clinton did her college thesis on his writings and President Obama writes about him in his books.

    Died: 06/12, 1972, Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA Education:University of Chicago, Spouse: Irene Alinsky.

    Books: Rules for Radicals, Reveille for Radicals .

    All eight rules are currently in play.

    How to create a social state by Saul Alinsky:

    There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state.
    The first is the most important.

    1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people.

    2) Poverty – Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

    3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level.. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

    4) Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the
    Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

    5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).

    6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to take control of what children learn in school.

    7) Religion – Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.

    8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor.
    This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take Taxes
    from the wealthy with the support of the poor.

    Does any of this sound like it is happening in the United States?

    Alinsky merely simplified Vladimir Lenin’s original scheme for world conquest by communism, under Russian rule.

    Stalin described his converts as “Useful Idiots.”

    The “Useful Idiots” have destroyed every nation in which they have seized power and control.

    It is presently happening at an alarming rate in the U.S.

    If people can read this and still say everything is just fine, then they are “useful idiots.”

    It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.

    Reply
  • September 3, 2019 at 3:12 am
    Permalink

    I made it to the 12:38 minute mark before I had to bail out.

    Here is my analysis of this debate, based on the length of time I was able to stomach watching it.

    Point #1: Both of these White men exhibited very noticeable fear of uttering a single word that might possibly offend or tweak the tender feelings of this liberal black guy.

    Point #2: The host was very obviously a nauseating liberal, but the other White guy – who was some kind of establishment Republican – was very clearly a RINO cuck; weak, effeminate, clearly more concerned with conforming to the dictates of Political Correctness than he was concerned about presenting a strong defense of the Second Amendment.

    Point #3: The black guy parroted the line of totalitarian, openly Bolshevik Communist rhetoric that he wants to round up every firearm owned by law abiding citizens in the entire United States due to the illegal actions of a tiny percentage of America’s population who use firearms to commit crimes. This equates to criminals being given the power to determine which freedoms and liberties law abiding, non-criminals should be allowed to enjoy. Makes me wonder if this black guy would support the passage of a law that required all men to submit to being castrated, since a tiny percentage men use their male anatomy to commit rape.

    Point #4: The Republican party cuck failed to point out that the Second Amendment was not included in the Bill of Rights for the purposes of making sure Americans could hunt deer or ducks. It had nothing whatsoever to do with hunting. The Second Amendment was placed in the Constitution and Bill of Rights for the express purpose of giving the citizens of this nation the means, weapons, and ability to resist Government tyranny – which means, that our Founders intended to guarantee that private citizens should be able to own and possess the same types of firearms that were in use by the military, so as to give them an equal level of firepower that some future tyrant might decide to unleash upon them. As it now stands, the U.S. military and the government already has a huge advantage over the armed citizenry – since they have fully automatic weapons, tanks, airplanes, bombs, missiles, and all sorts of very nasty chemical and biological weapons that some future Communist Democrat
    dictator would not hesitate to use on the White Conservative Trump supporters in the red states.
    This black liberal and his Communist Democrat comrades want to widen this already huge advantage even farther by banning citizen ownership of semi-automatic firearms and restricting the number of bullets per magazine? Someone try to tell me that this guy and his ilk do not have a secret desire to commit mass murder on the same scale as did the Bolshevik Communists who seized control of Russia in 1917.

    Point #5: What these Communists on the left are lusting to do – is to eventually ban all private ownership of firearms, but in the interim – they want to ban, confiscate, and make it illegal for law abiding citizens to own anything that is more sophisticated than a single shot .22 rifle. They are aiming to give the Communist dictatorship that they intend to impose on America insurmountable fire power superiority, so when they decide to go door to door and confiscate the few firearms that remain – they will have a huge advantage in case they face resistance.

    Final Point: There is no possibility that these Communists can ever be reasoned with. There will never be a middle ground compromise that will make them happy. Every time the right gives the left another gun control law and concedes to another restriction on the Second Amendment – it is never enough to satisfy these vultures. They will always come back and scream for more and more and more gun control laws, gun bans, magazine restrictions, ammunition restrictions, and these Communists will keep doing this until they succeed in abolishing the Second Amendment and until they have disarmed every law abiding American citizen. It is time to sit down and decide to break this country up and create a new nation that is solidly Red and let these crazy totallitarian leftists create their blue Communist Utopia.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Reto Rerangier Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Learn How to
Decode the Media.
Download your free copy now!

3 Keys to Decoding the Media by Rod Thomson