Feminism Truth

Feminists Won’t Like The Solution To Male Mistreatment Of Women

Rod Thomson

I’ve raised six boys to manhood and I think I have a pretty solid handle on what would solve the anger of feminists at men. But they won’t like the answer. Really won’t like the answer.

This thinking is spinning off from the political hackery against Brett Kavanaugh that also exposed some really strong emotions from a subset of women against men. Kavanaugh personally may have been innocent of the evidence-less accusations, but he acted as a locum for the generic anger this group of women have for men — for myriad reasons.

For some, there is real cause to be angry at a man, or a few men, who have acted badly. For others, it is a sort of unhinged anger building up through the feeding of a narrative. The latter is mostly represented in an astonishing opinion piece that the Washington Post published from a retired female college professor.

The Post’s screed by a retired Grinnell College history professor who admitted to going off on her husband for a 30-minute screaming tirade after the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation that started with the headline, “Thanks for not raping us, all you ‘good men.’ But it’s not enough” and included gems such as “I hate all men and wish all men were dead.”

Remember, she said this To. Her. Husband.

Now this woman appears to be the typical college professor feminist, but not the typical American or American woman, as we noted last week in a study that identified seven categories of Americans by general worldview. The smallest identified in the study (and by far the loudest, magnified by the media and Hollywood) is the “progressive activist” contingent of 8 percent.

But she is emblematic of the radicalized thought that is the 8 percent tail wagging the Democratic Party dog, that could gain more adherents if such thinking is more mainstreamed on the left as it is on college campuses — from which she hails. So it is critical to push back with reason commentary based on all of history, logic and personal experience, and then get to the solutions that, based on her faulty thinking below, she probably does not want to hear.

More Original Content On Patreon

We have to go through her tirade, because it embodies the thinking of the radicals driving Democrats and media coverage. She wrote:

“I yelled at my husband last night. Not pick-up-your-socks yell. Not how-could-you-ignore-that-red-light yell. This was real yelling. This was 30 minutes of from-the-gut yelling. Triggered by a small, thoughtless, dismissive, annoyed, patronizing comment. Really small. A micro-wave that triggered a hurricane. I blew. Hard and fast. And it terrified me. I’m still terrified by what I felt and what I said. I am almost 70 years old. I am a grandmother. Yet in that roiling moment, screaming at my husband as if he represented every clueless male on the planet (and I every angry woman of 2018), I announced that I hate all men and wish all men were dead.”

The hateful illness encompassed in those last words needs no further remarking. But the author, like so many radical feminists who have out-sized voices in the media and culture, really seems to believe that every human with two X chromosomes agree with her, because they all have the same genetic structure and therefore all think alike. This is the same leftist “thinking” that leads too many to call Kanye West a “token negro” and worse because he is breaking from the leftist form that all black people think alike because they are black. It’s a sick ideology.

“My husband of 50 years did not have to stifle a laugh. He took it dead seriously. He did not defend his remark, he did not defend men. He sat, hunched and hurt, and he listened. For a moment, it occurred to me to be grateful that I’m married to a man who will listen to a woman. The winds calmed ever so slightly in that moment. And then the storm surge welled up in me as I realized the pathetic impotence of nice men’s plan to rebuild the wreckage by listening to women.”

So while her cruel and hateful words spewed at her husband, leaving him “hunched and hurt,” she only became more angry and considered his niceness “pathetic impotence.” So is toxic masculinity the problem, or it’s opposite: pathetic impotence? There is simply no rational ideology or thinking process at work in this column the Post actually published.

“Don’t you dare sit there and sympathetically promise to change. Don’t say you will stop yourself before you blurt out some impatient, annoyed, controlling remark. [Note: Exactly what she is doing.] No, I said, you can’t change. You are unable to change. You don’t have the skills and you won’t do it. You, I said, are one of the good men. You respect women, you believe in women, you like women, you don’t hit women or rape women or in any way abuse women. You have applauded and funded feminism for a half-century. You are one of the good men. And you cannot change. You can listen all you want, but that will not create one iota of change.”

Again, to her husband of 50 years. I want to feel sorry for him, married to such a woman. I cannot imagine, because this surely is not the first time she has browbeat him. But perhaps he did deserve it, if he has been applauding and funding the kind of feminism that has led to this level of hate-fueled, vapid insipidness.

Get More Truth On Our Facebook Page

“And, for some reason, the most chilling memory of all, the one Christine Blasey Ford called up and that we all recognized: the laughter. The laughter of men who are bonding with each other by mocking us. When Ford testified under oath that the laughter is the sharpest memory of her high school assault, every woman within the sound of her voice could hear that laughter, had heard that laughter, somewhere, somehow.”

I won’t go into the obvious facts that most people see: There was zero corroboration or evidence to support Ford’s claim. None. But there were four witnesses to dispute it. That’s rational and fair-minded thinking. But for this author and those like her, an accusation alone is enough to prove veracity — no evidence required — if the accusation comes from a woman. The evidence here is that of this author living in a small information echo chamber of elite leftists. Just forehead smacking stuff from people who think so much of their own intelligence.

“The gender war that has broken out in this country is flooding all our houses.” No, it’s not. It’s really not. This is only in the fever swamps of feminists in the 8 percent. “It’s rising on the torrent of memories that every woman has.” No, they don’t.

However, there actually is a problem with men in our country, it’s just not the one the radical feminists are screaming about. The highest percentage of young men in our history are growing up without a father in the household, or any real male figure as this has become a generational problem. Ironically, it is feminists that has contributed mightily to this phenomenon in conjunction with the rise of the welfare state.

We have multiple generations of single-mother families, which has worked to impoverish a lot of women but also unleashed millions of young men into society that have no real concept of what it means to be a responsible adult man.

That’s where good fathers are essential. Of course, the most perfect, flawless men would still not placate the most hateful feminists, surely including the author in the Post, but in the end, that is on them and their choices.

I’ve taught my boys to honor, respect and protect women. They are to use their strength to protect women and the weak, never to prey on women or the weak. Never. Boys need to be reigned in from their natural, more base instincts — just as girls do but for different reasons with different results. Boys need to be given purpose that often involves physical labor when young, to channel their energy and strength into productivity, not into destruction.

Try Our Youtube Channel

But with six boys, the imperative to have a father who told them and modeled for them how to treat women is essential. And our boys were fortunate enough to have two sisters, and a mother and so they had plenty of practical opportunities.

Left to their own devices, boys will look for purpose in the pack, sometimes something beneficial such as sports, sometimes something destructive such as gangs. Or they will wander aimlessly and fall in with others operating on their base instincts. This is true in any area where single-parent homes dominate — and it holds true across race and ethnicity.

Conversely, in any area when boys have strong fathers who teach and model honoring attitudes towards women, the violence by young men is considerably less. Again, this is true regardless of race or ethnicity.

And here’s the full point: While I’ve used the first person “I” in this article, the reality is that this is all about the team my wife and I made in raising our children. We each brought our strengths that largely track with our gender. Whether you look at the biblical design for families, or just take history and research, the results are clear: two-parent families, male and female, are the best for raising children.

That is not the answer raging feminists want to hear. But it is the answer.

Rod Thomson is an author, TV talking head and former journalist, and is Founder of The Revolutionary Act. Rod is co-host of Right Talk America With Julio and Rod on the Salem Radio Network.

Drudge Got You Down? / Try WHATFINGER NEWS


Get more stuff like this

Don’t miss a single act of Revolutionary Truth... delivered to your inbox!

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

14 replies on “Feminists Won’t Like The Solution To Male Mistreatment Of Women”

I grew up with two parents, an older brother and older sister. My parents were good people. They fought, not frequently, never violently, never hurtfully, often loud. My father respected my mother and vice versa. They, I learned when I was old enough to realize it, were great role models , probably not even knowing it. The love and respect they showed each other was the most important thing I carried into adulthood, hopefully passing it to my children. Respect. Love. Just sayin…

Finally a voice of reason. Just like young male elephants go ‘rogue’ without the elder bulls (who have been poached for tusks), same goes for young males. Those who feel there is zero difference between the sexes, are deluding themselves. Sadly they exhibit the worst type of sexism around – denigrating an entire sex and wiping out any worth they bring to the table. For them, no father is necessay, only a sperm donor. And the next generation pays the price.

white knighting must stop, men must stop trying to protect women. until the gynocentric society puts women back in their place and remove the freedoms they not only dont want, but do not know how to handle……… wont be back . so what if humans go extinct ……….. remember a woman can only be queen ,…………never king.

1) I would not unzip my fly within ten feet of a feminist. Not just the unhinged variety, but the ‘abortion is a choice’, ‘I want it all’, ‘I’m with her’ feminists. There are too many good women on this planet to waste a minute on the rest. 2) I would not get drunk with strangers. Those days are over. Probably for the better of all of us. In the old days, you might wake up with a permanent ink mustache. Today, some jerk posts a video on the internet. 3) I would not dip my quill in the company ink. I met my wife at work, but it would not happen today. It’s not just that everyone knows who is with whom. It’s the speculation as to why. Not worth it. 4) I would invest a lot of time getting to know a woman before getting intimate. A LOT. Keep your ears open and they will tell you all you need to know.

Just the same, it is SO OBVIOUS that Brett Kavanaugh is not one of the bad guys and that the women who attacked him did so out of malice — not for him but for what he represents. None were credible. It’s important that the rest of us — the good guys and gals — attack the attackers without mercy.

People who knew better pretended ‘something happened to her’ and that Ford had some semblance of credibility. Contrary to popular belief, Ms. Ford has already been paid for her complicity via a gofundme campaign. She will have a book deal. She will make a lot of money speaking as a representative of all victims. This is obscene.

She is lucky she is married to a man who has no testicles. I would have been in the divorce lawyer’s office the next morning.

i would have been arrested for DV……….and believe me if im going down with that she wouldnt be smiling.

A man might have his fists but a woman has a stronger weapon, her mouth. How many domestic violence incidents could have been prevented if only the mouth was zipped till the next day.

Feminism is for resentful man haters who bully for empowerment. Everything our female professor admitted to.

Who would be stupid enough to hire a future human resource problem like these nasty feminists. You are begging for a lawsuit if you do.

This article is such a refreshing change! You hit the nail on the head–the Leftists and Feminists are living in the tiniest bubble, and their acrimony is the reason they don’t realize it. Normal people don’t want to be screamed at by raving lunatics, so we don’t challenge them. We just walk away and find calm, rational people to have thoughtful discussions with.

For the record, I’m a woman and a sexual assault survivor. I don’t hate all men, I don’t even hate the man who assaulted me–he was young, stupid, and drunk. Not an excuse, but a forgivable error for one who repents. Indeed, I’ve met a handful of jerks in my life, but the vast majority of men I’ve known are smart, caring, industrious people who instinctively protect women and children, and abhor those who don’t.

So please, all you good men of the world, on behalf of MOST women, accept my apologies for the shrieking shrews in that 8%, and as you said, let’s move forward and work as teams of men and women, moms and dads, to raise the next generation of young people into thoughtful, caring adults.

Finally, thank you for this and all the amazing articles you post on this site. Yours is the one and only blog I always read!

Our church has joined the Metoo movement. I don’t feel safe there, because I don’t know if some woman will accuse me of some sexual offense. I suppose based on Ford’s testimony I can be accused whether I’m at church or not. Heck, Kavanaugh wasn’t even at the party and he was accused.

Sounds like ‘pretty girl syndrome’ in middle age. When everyone defers to a girl because she’s beautiful she may never learn to deliver anything else. And as the beauty and the deference fades she can’t help being angry about it.

There are exceptions — In 80 years I’ve known TWO — but that’s the general rule. A man who marries one makes a serious mistake and deserves sympathy; a man who stays married to one deserves what he has.

What is called Feminism is not a social change movement. It is a cult of rage. The goal is to attack people – like Kavanuagh or Weinstein; to settle scores. but that’s only the beginning. They seek to act as though police. You think Blasey Ford was lying- you will be branded a bigot for those thoughts. You point out publicaly that Blasey Ford had no corroboration if you are a college Professor you will lose your job.

Comments are closed.

Learn How to
Decode the Media.
Download your free copy now!

3 Keys to Decoding the Media by Rod Thomson

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.