by Julio Gonzalez, M.D., J.D. and Rod Thomson

Two years barking up the wrong tree may now provide the direction to the correct tree in which to find the quarry.

On May 17, 2017, Bob Mueller was appointed Special Counsel to the investigation on Russian interference. Last Friday, nearly two years after his appointment and following the assignment of 19 lawyers, 40 FBI agents, 2,800 subpoenas, nearly 500 search warrants, and interviews with approximately 500 witnesses, Mueller’s report was presented to Attorney General William Barr.

The resounding conclusion, predictably enough was that “the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

Wrong tree.

After approximately $25 million of expenditures, two years of incessant torture of a duly elected President of the United States, the harassment and arrest of individuals involved in President Donald J. Trump’s campaign and sphere for reasons not involving collusion, the investigation found what the American people already knew: The President of the United States won the 2016 election because he was fairly elected by the people of the United States over one of the worst presidential candidates in American history!

Oh, yes, and the Russians were trying to interfere with our election process.

Well, there’s front-page news! The Russians were trying to disrupt the American political process! From Soviet times until now. And their interference has almost always been aimed more at sowing discord and division in America while undermining American institutions. On this score, they were wildly successful in 2016 and going forward largely thanks to the irresponsible American media.

But hidden within the pages of AG Barr’s summary are key words that could signal the new direction of the Russian meddling investigation, and perhaps one that would be much more fruitful: “Russian government actors successfully hacked into computers and obtained emails from persons affiliated with the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party organizations, and publicly disseminated those materials through various intermediaries, including WikiLeaks.”

Right tree.

Admittedly, this too is information of which most informed observers were aware, but here, for the first time, is an official admission by a dedicated investigator that Hillary Clinton’s emails, and/or those of her associates, were hacked by nefarious, foreign actors — specifically the Russians.

How far does this intrusion into Clinton’s emails go? We don’t know. That is precisely the question that should lead any subsequent investigators to Clinton’s email habits and an evaluation of her email security practices, not just relating to campaign emails, but those regarding nationally sensitive information such as her activities as Secretary of State.

There is other fertile ground for investigations, i.e. how did the FBI go so far down the wrong rabbit hole, who should be held responsible, were laws broken or the FISA courts lied to and is the law enforcement organization still compromised after the departure one way or another of most of its top leaders? These are implications of the the Mueller report. President Trump spoke of this when he said he hopes the other side is investigated.

Those investigations could and should follow and be part of the direct admission of the Clinton email hacking by Russia and its impact on the election. Doing so, it it were to be pursued, creates the most visible threat to Clinton, and the most likely direction in which any future inquiry regarding Russian meddling will inevitably go.

Dr. Julio Gonzalez is an orthopaedic surgeon and lawyer living in Venice, Florida. He is the author of The Federalist Pages and served in the Florida House of Representatives. He can be reached through www.thefederalistpages.com to arrange a lecture or book signing.


Drudge Got You Down? / Try WHATFINGER NEWS


Mueller Report Offers Path To Prosecute Hillary Clinton
Liked it? Take a second to support Rod Thomson on Patreon!

Get more stuff like this

Don’t miss a single act of Revolutionary Truth... delivered to your inbox!

9 thoughts on “Mueller Report Offers Path To Prosecute Hillary Clinton

  • March 26, 2019 at 12:35 pm
    Permalink

    Anthony Weiner’s laptop is probably where everything is
    .

    Reply
  • March 26, 2019 at 1:31 pm
    Permalink

    We’ve known for some time that Crooked Hillary, Bill Clinton, and their foundation have been responsible for Russian interference and sales of nuclear fuels through Fusion GPS. Will our justice system ever really protect hard-working Americans from this criminal cabal? The previous DOJ, FBI, BO/BS, Bill, Hillary, and their administrations should all be in prison and/or hung from the nearest tree for treasonous acts.

    Reply
    • March 27, 2019 at 12:43 am
      Permalink

      I vote for being hanged then drawn and quartered. Seems appropriate.

      Reply
      • March 27, 2019 at 10:39 am
        Permalink

        Agreed. But Hillary’s punishment will be more along the lines of NOTHING.

        Reply
  • March 26, 2019 at 5:58 pm
    Permalink

    OK fine, now here’s what you seem to have missed. Mueller was the “cleaner.” He hired 10 of the criminal’s personal lawyers and cohorts and gave them 2 years to destroy evidence and finesse anything and everything they could to cover up exactly who did what and how it was all connected. And then he paid them $25 million.

    If this were a square house, which it isn’t Mueller himself would be in front of a grand jury for not preserving evidence. In fact he has defacto allowed evidence to be destroyed.

    Reply
  • March 27, 2019 at 10:38 am
    Permalink

    “Mueller Report Offers Path To Prosecute Hillary Clinton”

    LOL! THAT will be the day! I’m all for it, but hasn’t it become obvious, YET, that Democrats (ESPECIALLY Dems named Clinton) simply DO NOT FACE CONSEQUENCES!? Even if they DID re-open the fake Hillary investigation…they’d just cover for her again anyway! LOL! Be for real, here…

    Reply
  • Pingback: I wonder if « gregormendelblog.com

  • March 31, 2019 at 12:50 am
    Permalink

    As a Democrat who believes in JUSTICE FOR ALL (regardless of party) , the issue isnt what the FBI investigated, it is what they DIDNT investigate.
    1) Comey announced (Jul 5, 2016) that they had investigated INTENT offenses and found no evidence of INTENT.
    2) The OIG conducted an investigation (into his investigation) finding several problems (Jun 14, 2018), noting that the scope was limited to INTENT – BUT NO ONE HAS ASKED WHY.
    3) There are at least a dozen “strict liability” (to borrow a civil term) laws that by her own admission she violated – so WHY werent these within the scope of the investigation ?

    Reply

Leave a Reply to D3F1ANT Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Learn How to
Decode the Media.
Download your free copy now!

3 Keys to Decoding the Media by Rod Thomson